Archive for August, 2006

Venomous Screed?

Sunday, August 27th, 2006

Subject: Venomous Screed On Democrats Attributed to J.D. Pendry
 

Dear Sgt.Major Pendry:
 

I received this screed in an e-mail today which has been circulating evidently around cyberspace for some time.  Because I don’t believe a person of your intellect, rank and responsibility would stoop this low to write such a venomous screed, I am sending it to you since it was received in my e-mail from an acquaintance attributing you as its author.  Whoever the author was it is clear they don’t have a clear head for history since Ronald Reagan, Newt Gingrich, Duke Cunningham, Bill Frist, Tom DeLay, and a host of so called Republican Chickenhawks were not mentioned.
 

I wanted you to see it first so you can comment on it and perhaps issue a denial that can wind its way through cyberspace setting the record straight that a man of your polish, military bearing, and common decency does not deserve to be blasphemed in this way by Right Wing Conservative cranks.
 

Sincerely,
Rayne Poussard
Served:  USN
Former:  Maine State Police
Fortune 500 company retiree
 

***
 

I just received some crap you wrote, in an email.  

What a crock of Bullshit.
 
While your credentials, on your website, appear admirable, your diatribe does little more than toss you in the mix with what’s wrong in this country.
 
Obviously you have a penchant for slamming the political left…. as if there is some value to your wayward observations.  Surely they do little more than incite those who think as you do, and little to resolve issues.
 
While I am in agreement that the liberal mindset is misguided, I suspect that one Rush Limbaugh is more than needed.
 
Might you not be better suited doing something constructive with your experiences? Your babble is a far cry from an example of leadership.
 

Dave Navarro, Sr.
 

***
 

J. D., you’re the lead axis idiot!  Crawl back in the hole you came from!!
rdr  SHALOM   666

There was Bob and Mel too and some others that now line the bottom of my cyber birdcage.


On June 24, 2006, I posted On Your Hands to my mail list.  It’s been forwarded and reposted around the net and is now bringing a stream of cyber courage to my mailbox.  I once responded to this stuff thinking I could rationalize with the senders.  Turns out that I can’t.  I don’t owe Payne, Dave, Mel, Bob, that last nut or any others an explanation for anything I say or write.  Besides, when I converse with them I get their venomous screed in return.  I’ve decided I’m no longer interested in their opinions nor should I be.  If they were interested in discussion with me, they wouldn’t open with “What a crock of bullshit.” then end with condescending concern for my intellect, bearing and credentials. I guess they think I’ve lost my way.


Do you know what I care about?  I care about what my subscribers think because of who they are.  My mail list includes veterans from World War II through Iraq, active duty Servicemen and Women from all branches of the services, Parents and Grandparents of Serving Soldiers and Patriots who haven’t served but love our country and truly support our Military Men and Women – and probably some group I didn’t name, but also appreciate.  The service and spirit of these outstanding Americans keeps us free.  Their mail keeps me going.  Whenever I feel like stopping – usually following a load of Payne mail -, I’ll get mail from some of the group thanking me for what I have to say.  One of those notes counters all of the Payne mail I get.  If my subscribers don’t like what I have to say, they vote by hitting the unsubscribe button which I must brag doesn’t happen too often.  As long as I have subscribers, I’ll be writing each week.  When I no longer have any, I’ll send notes to myself.  I thank all of you right wing conservative cranks for your support of our Country and Troops.
 

It’s been a journey for me to arrive at this state of mind.  I spent much time in uniform marveling at mediocre politicians and unable to talk about the harm their decisions often brought because it wasn’t my place to do that.  My priorities had to be getting the job done and looking out for the Soldiers in my charge.  On the inside looking out, it was rare to hear anyone calling politicians and others to task for their wrong-headed decisions that hurt the military or for their hateful comments.  They enjoy their elite sport of politics often to the detriment of Service Men and Women.  I promised myself that if I was ever able to speak out about them, I would.  So I am.  I’m a small voice in a cyber world of millions, but obviously what I share with my list of subscribers gets around some.  Whether it does any good or not, I don’t know, but it makes me feel better.  It also makes those suffering from terminal CRIS quite angry.  I can’t help that.  Their misguided hatred for anything slightly right of the far left is a problem for them – and maybe Joe Lieberman – but not me.
 

I’m an Army enlisted retiree, not a Fortune 500 retiree, who lives on a hillside in West Virginia.  My perspective on life and the times from out here in fly over around country probably differs some from what they’re accustomed.  They often try to correct my view of history.  Problem with that is that the history reference on which I most rely is a living one.  Most often, it’s a reference to which they didn’t have access.
 

When President Jimmy Carter became Commander in Chief, he inherited an Army that was broken by many years of political mishandling of the Vietnam War.  A war committed to by John Kennedy, broadened by Lyndon Johnson, ran from Washington and ended in defeat by Richard Nixon.  A Democrat Congress eventually abandoned South Vietnam and the region to communist murderers.  The monument to their achievement was communist reeducation camps and the Cambodian killing fields.  They’ll do it again given the opportunity.
 

The Army’s morale was lower than whale crap because the only public recognition Soldiers coming home from war got was from lying hippies the likes of John Kerry and Hanoi Jane Fonda.  During what needed to be a rebuilding time for our Army, politicians neglected us and a misled public disdained us.  There was no money for training nor was there any to repair and replace worn-out, broken equipment.  We rationed toilet paper.  Imagine that for the most powerful nation on earth.  Carter raised our morale by granting amnesty to draft dodgers and upgrading the dishonorable discharges of deserters.  He also took away from us a long-range threat when he cancelled production of the B1 bomber.  A flaccid response to Iranian terrorism and a disastrous rescue attempt put the capper on Carter’s Army for me.  And I was still a youngun.
 

When President Regan became the Commander in Chief, it was as if the clouds parted for the sun to come out.  We got our first decent pay raises in years.  We started rebuilding and retraining our Army.  When Soldiers have good equipment and the funds to maintain it along with good training, the morale rises proportionately.  I was disappointed some when we didn’t pound the snot out of Hezbollah and their state sponsors in 1983.  Maybe the time wasn’t right.  Study tells me the President’s advisors talked him out of retaliation.  We did hit the Iranians in the Becca Valley, but we should have put a few in Khomeini’s living room just as we did in Gadafi’s in 1986.  Heard from Gadafi lately?  It’s a practice we should’ve continued.
 

President Regan strengthened and modernized our forces in Europe, not intent only to defend against potentially invading Soviet bloc forces but to destroy them – on the front line and their follow-on forces still at home before they could join the fight.  He rebuilt our military strength at such a pace the Soviets couldn’t keep up so they gave up.  Silly politicians laughed at President Regan’s vision of ballistic missile defense snickeringly labeling his Strategic Defense Initiative Star Wars.  History will recall Harry Reid’s “We just killed the Patriot Act” the same way it recalls that mistake.  President Regan could see this day when tin pot dictators and Islamic fascists could threaten our country with ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons.  His opponents could only see another play in their endless quest to win at the sport of politics where the most important prize is political power.  They’re not laughing so much today.  And thanks to them, neither are the rest of us.
 

The first President Bush inherited a great Military force and when needed it cut through the Soviet equipped, liberal media named “elite Republican Guard” and world’s fourth largest standing Army in 100 hours of ground combat.  Fresh from the war, the heavily armored VII Corps based in Germany was among the first to deactivate as we started to downsize the military and cash in on our mythical “peace dividend” since the political consensus was that we no longer had an enemy that required a large standing military force.  We’ve made the same mistake throughout our history.  Our motto should be Once Dominant, Always Dominant.  We’ll only know peace in this world when everyone knows we can and decisively will kick their hind ends if need be.
 

President Bill Clinton became the first honest-to-God draft dodger to become Commander in Chief, yet I don’t recall any Dan Rather breaking news stories about that.  I don’t profess to speak for everyone who served in the Armed Forces during President Clinton’s two terms, but the Military air of respect that generally surrounds the CINC was missing in action for me.  Maybe it was just me, but I could never get past his draft dodger status and this: 
 

“I am writing too in the hope that my telling this one story will help you to understand more clearly how so many fine people have come to find themselves still loving their country but loathing the military…” -  Bill Clinton, December 3, 1969


 

Google his letter, read the whole thing, and remember there’s worse than him hoping to lead our country into capitulation to radical Islam.  One of his first moves was to declare that he would scrap the ban on homosexuals serving in the Military.  I remember reading to a battalion of Soldiers the required, canned briefing on the “don’t ask don’t tell” policy and reprimanding those in uniform who openly opposed it.  Along with other social reengineering, we continued to cut the strength of our forces throughout his presidency.  We reduced an active Army of 760,000 to around 460,000 yet the National Security Strategy of fighting two major regional conflicts simultaneously never changed.  The strength of the Army nearly halved while deployments tripled and quadrupled – again, not much on that in the media.  The leading cheerleaders for the cuts are now the loudest voices proclaiming that we don’t have enough troops.  With smaller forces, we kept and maintained unneeded U.S. bases – and still do - for the benefit of political pork.  The citizens of our country need to give thanks, each day for the quality military force, with top notch Soldiers and leaders that President Clinton inherited.  A lesser quality force could not have sustained and made the adjustments needed to continue the mission of defending our country.  Still, we endured losses to terrorists; the most memorable a humanitarian aid effort that mission crept into something else and cost us Soldiers in Mogadishu.  It was a light Infantry force of Special Operations and Rangers.  The Commander in Chief denied them the armor they requested that would’ve easily squashed and extricated them from the ambush they encountered.  Not much play on that angle in the news either.
 

Never adequately responding to them, the terrorists became bolder with each successive attack – until 9/11.
 

Contrary to the beliefs of liberal leaning Americans and the news media, President George Bush is not responsible for the actions of the Islamic Nazis that killed nearly 3000 of us in a span of minutes.  Nor is he responsible for the fact that they’ve been doing it for many years and continue to do it around the world.  Failed policy or actually no policy for the years prior to President Bush got us where we were on 9/11.  Like him or not, he’s the Commander in Chief that insists on taking the fight to our enemy.  People like Payne call the President and others Chickenhawks.  I suppose in their view the CINC should strap it on and lead the troops into battle.  I served more than half my existence on this planet in uniform and people like Payne call me a Chickenhawk too.  It says more about Payne than it does anyone else.  I guess I don’t possess the warrior qualities of Johns Kerry and Murtha.  Was President Clinton a Chickenhawk when he committed troops to Bosnia and Kosovo?  Or, when he flung a few missiles in the general direction of bin Laden?
 

A couple of days before I wrote On Your Hands, I saw pictures of the grossly mutilated bodies of two young American Soldiers.  I was as angry that day as I was on 9/11 when I lost friends in the Pentagon.  I saw those pictures posted on the Internet and wondered if any of their family members might have seen them.
 

In my minds eye, I saw something else.  Something Payne and friends may or may not understand.  I saw the faces of the 14 platoon’s worth of young men and women I trained as a Drill Sergeant.  I saw the faces of many great men and women that I served with for 28 years.  I saw something else in there too.  I saw a gin-soaked Ted Kennedy with his poster of Abu Ghraib proclaiming that Sadaam’s torture chambers reopened under U.S. management.  I saw Dick Durbin equating our Soldiers to Nazis and operators of Soviet gulags.  I saw John Kerry reliving his glory days by saying that American Soldiers were terrorizing Iraqi women and children in their homes each night.  I saw that other Democrat war hero John Murtha labeling U.S. Marines as cold-blooded murderers.  I saw an endless string of stupid politicians – Democrat and Republican - undermining the efforts of our Commander in Chief and every single member of his cabinet.  I saw the New York Times running stories about our intelligence gathering techniques.  I saw enough to decide that I wasn’t going to sit around and listen anymore to people who are too silly to realize that we’re at war with an enemy that’s proven repeatedly that they’ll keep coming for us until we destroy them.  We’ve ran from them since 1979.  It’s time to push back.
 

Yes Payne, I wrote that venomous screed and I stand by every word of it.  

Copyright (C) JD Pendry 2006

 

 

Profiling

Sunday, August 20th, 2006

A Pakistani woman and supposed resident of one of our local communities for the past year purchased a one-way ticket to Michigan the day before her scheduled flight.  TSA inspectors detained her at the Tri-State Regional airport here in Wild Wonderful.  Turns out, she had four containers of liquid in her carry-on bag.  Two of the containers tested positive on two successive tests for explosives residue.  Then the best explosives detector, a dog nose, also alerted on them.  The substance inside the bottles turned out not to be explosives, but it leaves you to wonder about the residue.  You can pick up enough residues to test positive on the detection machine and in the dogs nose just by being near nitrates.  Maybe she had a truckload of fertilizer in her garage, or maybe there was an intentional dusting of nitrates on her bottles.   Her mother says we should apologize.  According to Mom, the daughter was “profiled” because she is Pakistani and was wearing Muslim attire.  Of course, the scrutiny had nothing to do with the fact that she was attempting to carry containers of liquid onto an airplane when everyone in the nation, or possibly the entire electronically connected world, knew they were prohibited from carry-on a week before.  The ACLU will probably sue, following which we’ll only be allowed to check the carry-on bags of Caucasian Grandmothers and infants.  They’ll probably find a friendly judge in Detroit to take their case. 

Take a lesson from this incident.  If someone clears a security screening in one of our small regional airports, he or she will not go through screening again to make a connecting flight in one of the major hubs.  I’ve flown from Yeager Airport in Charleston, WV to make connecting flights from Chicago.  Once I cleared Yeager’s security, I was inside the security ring and could usually walk to my connecting gate at Chicago’s O’Hare without another screening.  Here’s a question for all of you old soldiers.  If you were going to recon the security of a regional airport, isn’t this how you’d do it - send a supposedly innocent woman through airport security, with banned substances dusted with nitrate residue?  I think our security was tested here at Tri-State regional.  I’m just curious about how many other small airports were tested.  I hope that the people who are supposed to know about such things are not writing this off as an isolated incident, but instead are alerting security at all of these one or two gate small regional airports.  We should also remember that it was domestic flights that were hi-jacked on 9/11, not international ones.  Following the breakup of the recent plot to destroy trans-Atlantic US Airliners, the British seem to have broken the code on who needs scrutiny.  Do you expect that we’ll toss away political correctness here before it kills us?  Our profiling victim was flying to Michigan.  There’s quite a large Arab  population there, not that I’m profiling mind you, and a couple of their all American young men were busted and charged with terror related money laundering and soliciting or providing support for acts of terrorism.  Their lawyers say they were singled out because they’re Hyphenated-Americans.  Interesting here is the large amount of cell phones they’re buying.  Cell phones that can make hard to trace international calls or remotely detonate explosives.  Do you reckon the New York Times will write a story explaining to Americans why terrorists might be interested in cell phones with which they can make hard to trace international calls?  I think The New York Times has trouble printing anything that might prove pro-American or in the best interest of our national security.  They can plaster Abu Ghraib on their front page for months at a time, but can’t seem to find much positive to say about the efforts of the U.S. Military in Iraq.  That’s why it didn’t surprise me when I saw their article cheerleading for the “rebuilding” efforts of Hezbollah [requires a free registration to read the article].  I suppose it would be too complicated for them to report on our rebuilding efforts in Iraq.  The information must be too difficult for their trained, professional journalists to find.  They do a great job of profiling American Soldiers to fit their boneheaded liberal views while spinning positive for killers.  Maybe Hezbollah will be there to rebuild New York following their next successful attack.  The Times is probably not on the terrorist’s target list, however.  No reason for them to destroy a helpful and free intel source and propaganda machine.  President Jimma is back in the news.  He’s doing some Israeli and evil American profiling for Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine.  The title of the interview speaks for itself.  It doesn’t take him long to lie about Israel.

“I don’t think that Israel has any legal or moral justification for their massive bombing of the entire nation of Lebanon.”

 He also found time to root for Castro.  I’m thinking senile dementia.  We have more of the Carter legacy to haunt us.  U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, a Carter activist judge appointee, declared the NSA Terror Surveillance program, liberally incorrectly labeled as a domestic spying program, unconstitutional.  Are you surprised that the ACLU selected her court to file their lawsuit?  I don’t know what takes place inside these heads.  Is this what terminal cranial rectum inversion syndrome looks like?  Sorry, I was doing a little profiling there of my own.Finally, if you say movie star to me my profiling image is of spoiled, liberal, uneducated, airhead pretenders who simply aren’t able to defend themselves and don’t have enough courage and sense to defend our country.  It must be a little frosty in Hell this week as 84 of them signed on to this:

 

 

“If we do not succeed in stopping terrorism around the world, chaos will rule and innocent people will continue to die.”

 I salute them and will place this group on my A-list for spending my movie dollars.  I just wonder why I had to find the story in an Australian paper.  I thought the New York Times would’ve jumped all over such a story.
 
 If you need me, I’ll be in the back yard working on the bunker. 

Copyright © J.D. Pendry 2006

Apocalypse When?

Sunday, August 13th, 2006

For centuries, Muslim countries would declare war on European countries, seize their merchant ships and hold the crews for ransom or sell them into slavery.  The Muslim countries of the North African Barbary Coast Region produced the Barbary Pirates.  State sponsored terrorism is not a modern notion. In William J. Bennett’s book, America, The Last Best Hope, he describes an encounter between Thomas Jefferson and an Arab diplomat while Jefferson was the U.S. Minister to France in the mid 1780’s.  Jefferson demanded that the Arab diplomat tell him by what right his country had attacked Americans in the Mediterranean.  Jefferson recounted the Arab’s response: 

“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found [emphasis mine], and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners.”

We paid ransom for our hostages to the leaders of these pirate-producing countries and state sponsors of terror for the next twenty years.  It stopped in 1805 after President Jefferson decided force was the language best understood by the Arab hostage takers.  In the process, the Marines added “to the shores of Tripoli” to their hymn.

That’s just one historical instance for you to ponder.  When you next hear talk of how America or George Bush is the cause of the rise of Islamo-fascism, share some history with the purveyor of that talk.  We’re slow learners here in the land of the free.  It’s probably because we ignore [refuse to take notice of or be ignorant of] history, even recent deadly history.  I heard only just the other day that one third of Americans when asked didn’t know what year 9/11 happened. 

People who feel divinely led to kill us hoping their own deaths are their tickets to paradise and 72 virgins, black-eyes, wives or however you decide to describe the reward are dangerous people.  Most reasonable people would consider that a cult thought, not a religious one.  As a society, I’m not sure we’ve grasped the concept that only a few options exist for us in this cultural collision - conversion to radical Islam, our own destruction, dhimmitude or the complete destruction of the Islamo-fascists.  Their eagerness to die for what they believe directly opposes our desire to live in pursuit of what we believe.  That’s why a UN imposed cease-fire between a sovereign nation and a terror organization that ignores all laws, except for some wild-eyed Mullah’s fatwa - and agreements won’t work – unless you’re Hezbollah, then it works well as your time to regroup, recover, refit and prepare to strike again at a time of your choosing.  If UN resolutions worked, UN Resolution 1559 would have been the end of an armed Hezbollah in Lebanon.  If peacekeeping operations worked for terrorists, we would not have had 241 Marines killed in Lebanon in 1983.  If UN resolutions worked, we wouldn’t be in Iraq today.  We continue to prove the Einstein definition of insanity - doing the same thing repeatedly while expecting a different result.  The safest Americans [and non-Islamic Westerners] at this time in history are the ones who are armed and confronting the Islamo-Nazi movement on our terms and not theirs.  The rest of us sheeple dread the next inevitable attack from the wolf-pack and hope our elected sheep dogs will put aside their political quests long enough to concertedly confront the wolves.  But, with a Ned Lamont win in Connecticut as an indicator, that’s not likely.

In 1979, we responded to terror acts by the Islamo-fascists with a policy of restraint.  In 1983, we left Beirut with 241 dead Marines, without confronting the Hezbollah terrorists or their Iranian masters.  In 1986, we responded to the Libyan bombing of a Berlin disco frequented by American Soldiers, by putting some bombs into Gadafi’s living room.  But, we didn’t do much of anything about the first World Trade Center bombing, the USS Cole Bombing, Khobar Towers bombing, bombing of our embassies in Africa…right up until 9/11.  It took 3000 dead in our cities to get our attention and now people are forgetting about that.

The long list of attacks we didn’t respond to led to 9/11.  History and the recent plot to hijack and down 10 US Airliners over the Atlantic shows that the Islamo-Fascists are among us and will not stop coming for us until they get what they want or until they’re rendered incapable of pursuing those goals.  Making martyrs of them is not the answer, the complete destruction of their leadership and support structure is.  I fear that it’ll take a successful attack on us rather that a foiled one to regain our attention.  But, that could be too late.

Ahmadinijad has promised the world Iran’s response to our concerns about their nuclear program on August 22.  I’ve been curious since I first heard it as to what might be so special to Ahmadinijad about that date.

What is the significance of Aug. 22?  This year, Aug. 22 corresponds, in the Islamic calendar, to the 27th day of the month of Rajab of the year 1427.  This, by tradition, is the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of the prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to “the farthest mosque,” usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back (c.f., Koran XVII.1).        Bernard Lewis, Middle East Scholar, Opinion Journal, August 8, 2006.

Ahmadinijad has an apocalyptic worldview, believing he’s on a divine mission to bring about the final battle between good and evil.  Islam of course is his good and we are his evil.

Mike Wallace recently interviewed Ahmadinijad for the 60 Minutes program.  I didn’t watch the interview, but did hear Mr. Wallace leave a talk radio host speechless when he described Ahmadinijad as a bright and rational man that really doesn’t hate Jews, but would prefer that they move.  After millions watch the interview on television, I believe we will have had our Chamberlain “peace in our time” moment in this war.  CBS reports that in his interview, Ahmadinijad made this statement:

 

“We are all free to choose.  But please give him [President Bush] this message, sir: Those who refuse to accept an invitation will not have a good ending or fate.”   – Ahmadinijad to Mike Wallace

Do you recall, that in early May 2006, Ahmadinijad wrote a letter to President Bush?  In that letter, he offered the same invitation.  Although getting no play in our brainless media then or now, this may constitute a da’wa.  In Islam, the invitation to convert or submit to Islam is a necessary prelude to an offensive war.

This is a centuries old fight.  The terror organizations are on the homicide-bombing periphery, although Hezbollah now possesses strategic weapons, which is a new wrinkle for a “stateless” terror organization.  In spite of the Mike Wallace-Ahmadinijad mutual admiration society, we must not forget that the enemy is led by a man with an apocalyptic worldview who believes death is good and has no compunction about taking millions of us and his own with him on his mission to fulfill his divine mission.

Copyright © J.D. Pendry 2006.

 

 

Mail Call

Tuesday, August 8th, 2006

An Email note to my subscribers: 

“As you are so quick to judge the actions of decorated Leaders, How much time did you spend in Vietnam, or other Combat.
 
I have now [sic] interest in joining a person who bad mouths decorated Military”  -from Mel H.

I usually avoid weekday postings to my mail list.  I’m grateful that a growing number of new subscribers invite me into their mailbox daily so I choose not to wear out my welcome.  I never know which of my comments caused them to want to subscribe, but I’m appreciative that they do.  I try to respond to each right away if possible. 

This is a special reply to someone who hit the subscribe button that I wanted to share with all subscribers, so if you’ll allow, I’ll try to be brief.I have a need to answer Mel’s email.  Since Mel sent it to me disguised as a subscriber, I opened and read it.  My rules don’t allow me to share Mel’s email address since technically he’s a subscriber.  I’m sending a blind copy of this to Mel, then I’ll dump his email into the box where I store the ISP information on such emails should they become future pests.  Without further delay, allow me to address Mel’s concerns.

Mel, I don’t know if you have service or not.  If you do, I thank you for it.  I served 28 years in the Army.  I enlisted in 1971 right in the middle of hippies, draft dodgers and Ex-Presidents that didn’t inhale.  From the time I enlisted through the completion of my training, I received daily assurances that I was bound for Vietnam.  I knew that when I walked through a surprised recruiter’s door on North Clark Street in Chicago. Turns out, we were already beginning to draw down by the time I was ready to go in 1972.  The Army sent me to Korea instead.  I was a combat support Soldier Mel.  For 28 years, I went where the Army told me and did what was asked.  So, to answer your qualifying question, no I was never in direct combat.  Which, might surprise you, is not uncommon for a beans and bullets Soldier that served during my time when the Army’s peacetime strength approached a million?  In your mind, I suppose that disqualifies me to have an opinion about military leaders.  Heck Mel, I wrote a book on the topic, still sells a few too.

I moved my family 13 times in 28 years.  Had some challenging jobs too.  Some things have shocked me since I retired from the Army.  The knowledge that the fraternity of military veterans represents only about 3 percent of our population and combat veterans less than that.  I still struggle with the concept of an 8-hour workday, am usually awake by 0400, and I get itchy feet when I realize that I haven’t moved in the past 7 years.  So, Mel don’t expect an apology from me for my service.  I was there everyday for 28 years, often at the expense of things you might take for granted, like days with your kids and nights with your wife.  I served at the pleasure of my country and to the needs of the Army.

As for my judgment of “decorated leaders”.  If you Google my name you’ll find about a zillion articles out there that I’ve written.  Of all of them, you’ll find me questioning only a few so-called “decorated leaders”.  The list is quite short actually, and it consists of “decorated leaders” who chose to highlight their service if it appeared to be of political advantage to them at the time.  My short list has on it, Senator John Kerry, Congressman John Murtha and a bevy of retired political Generals.

Let’s take them one at a time.  I never questioned Senator Kerry’s service, although there is mounds of legitimate evidence out there that raises serious questions about much of it, all of which he could resolve by releasing all of his records to public scrutiny.  When the Senator was trying to be President, he posted a copy of a DD Form 214 (Discharge form) on his website.  It’s been removed now.  There were some eyebrow raisers on it.  I review military records almost daily.  I noticed that the good Senator received an honorable discharge in 1978, “following a review by a board of officers” most likely under the provisions of Title 10 US Code, Section 1163.  Just so that you know, there is no need for “a board of officers to review” a discharge unless it is other than honorable.  As you’re doing your research Mel, you’ll find that [Title 10 US Code, Section 1163] to be the Jimmy Carter law that granted amnesty to draft dodgers and upgraded discharges for deserters and others.  I had no need to study his record further, although I did find the Silver Star with a “V” device interesting.  Still, I only condemned Mr. Kerry because he came home from a short stint in a combat zone and told horrific, completely unsubstantiated, lies about American Soldiers thinking it would get him elected to Congress.  Mr. Kerry and his associates prolonged Vietnam.  I have the utmost respect for warriors.  In my opinion, Mr. Kerry isn’t one.

Congressman Murtha?  I never questioned his service, although there are some out there who do.  You see Mel, I don’t like it when someone uses his combat service record, valid or not, as a credential to label Marines serving in combat as cold blooded killers, which is what Mr. Murtha did.  No one loyal to those with whom he served does that.  Period.  Instead, he shuts his mouth and allows the Uniformed Code of Military Justice to perform its function.  Murtha harmed the morale of Soldiers in combat, just as John Kerry, Jane Fonda et al did.  I don’t appreciate any “decorated leader” jeopardizing Soldiers, their mission or the security of our country to score political points.

Finally, I had some words for our collection of political Generals, all retired by the way, who decided to attack the conduct of the war and our civilian leadership – after they left.  Politicians and Soldiers don’t mix well Mel.  You can be one or the other, but not both.  Soldiers do not choose the civilian leadership of our military, but swear oaths to obey them and to defend the Constitution, which provides for civilian control over the military.  These officers violated their oaths and selected politics over Soldiers.  I’m sorry, but that type decision disqualifies one as a “military” leader in my view. So there you have it Mel, the total list of “decorated leaders” that I’ve questioned.  And people are still subscribing Mel, go figure.

Regards. 

P.S., I didn’t add you to the list.   

Breakfast Update: Front Toward Enemy

Sunday, August 6th, 2006

Captain Ed at Captain’s Quarters, finds a new mission for Joe Wilson.  Michelle Malkin critques Reuters doctored photographs. Powerline points out that London had more pro Hezbollah demonstrators than Bahgdad. France tells us how great Iran is.

Front Toward Enemy

Sunday, August 6th, 2006

I’m having an identity crisis.  No, it’s not a mid-life event.  I fell off that hill quite some time back…  Maybe it’d be more accurate to say I’m sharing an ID crisis – with much of the Western world.

Before leaning forward in the foxhole, can we agree that it’s generally a good idea to know which direction forward is?  The Claymore anti-personnel mine has on the business side of it an embossed warning that reads FRONT TOWARD ENEMY.  That’s so there is no mistaking which direction to point it.  The problem facing much of Western civilization, which includes Hollywood, France and Washington DC, is that we’re intent on pointing the Claymores towards ourselves.  We’re not collectively oriented toward an enemy.  That’s because not all of us agree about who the enemy is.  

Our media, and many who seek the media lights, got their shorts in a bunch this week because another drunken movie star made some stupid comments.  Mel Gibson’s anti-Semitic slurs while intoxicated permeated the news – print and broadcast.  Surely, you heard about it – ad nauseam.  But, did you hear much about the anti-Semitic statements made by the supposedly sober Muslim who shot up the Jewish Federation center in Seattle?  Have you heard any lengthy news discussions about the anti-Semites who actually follow through on their slurs and threats by killing people and firing ball-bearing filled rockets into their neighborhoods?  With maniacs like this running about the world bent on our destruction, we spent a week concluding that Mel Gibson is the most evil, dangerous anti-Semite out there.  On top of that, half of Washington and much of the media believe George Bush is our enemy and the UN is our friend.  You can almost hear the Twilight Zone music playing in the background. Work through this identity crisis with me.Are you an Islamic-fascist?  If you’re Islamic, it means you are a follower of the religion of Islam.  Hopefully, a peaceful follower.  If you’re an Islamic-fascist, you exalt the Islamic religion above all other religions, governments and individuals.  You want a centralized autocratic government under Sharia law led by a dictatorial Grand Mullah.  You support severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.  You wish to continue living life in the 7th century and making no art, literary, scientific or technological contributions to the modern world.  As so eloquently explained in the Hamas Covenant, you probably have plans to carry out those ideals and you are willing to accept Judaism and Christianity or other religions as long as they exist “under the wing of Islam.”  Your name might be Ahmadinajad and you probably belong to a select fraternal organization.  Do you fit in here anywhere?  If you do, you probably know in which direction to point your homicide bomber’s vest.Are you a Zionist?  Now that’s a name often said with venom, but never explained – even by the free Western media.  A Zionist, simply put, is one who believes in the right of Israel to exist in its ancient and Biblical homeland.Are you a Jew?Are you a Christian?

Are you a follower of any religion?

Are you a Crusader?  According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, “The Crusades were expeditions undertaken, in fulfillment of a solemn vow, to deliver the Holy Places from Mohammedan tyranny.”  At our current rate of appeasement, we may need a Crusade or two to retake Washington, DC.  Certainly, France, most of Europe and the beaches in Italy will require them.

If you’re not a Zionist, Christian, Jew, Crusader or follower of another religion then you’re just a run of the mill Infidel.  This category includes atheists, the ACLU and most of Hollywood.  You’re probably into self-worship.  You could be a politician.

There’s a category for everyone here.  But, there is also a great dividing line.  Make no mistake.  The war we’re in is about religion.  It is also a continuance of the Biblical clash of cultures that’s existed for thousands of years.  One culture feels divinely led and seeks death for martyrdom as a route to paradise.  The other culture seeks life and the God given freedom that comes with it.  The obvious question is can the two coexist?

Iran’s Supreme Leader[a dictatorial Grand Mullah] Khamenei: ‘America Can Expect a Resounding Slap and a Devastating Fist-Blow From the Muslim Nation’; Hizbullah is the Muslim Nation’s ‘Front Line of Defense’; ‘There is No Way to Confront… the Zionists… and the ‘Great Satan’ [the United States in case you’re wondering] Except Through Martyrdom’ - MEMRI

Still having an ID crisis?  The Supreme Leader’s screed should’ve cleared it all up for you.  There is only one way for Western civilization to survive in our World War against Islamic-fascists.  Front toward enemy.Copyright (C) JD Pendry 2006